Quantopian: MAD Portfolio an alternative to Markowitz?

With reference to this discussion on Quantopian:

MAD Portfolio an Alternative to Markowitz?

Here is the spreadsheet which seems to prove Scipy.Optimise.Minimise is not a good way of finding the minimum portfolio volatility. Or at least not as drafted.

MAD Brute Force Spreadsheet

Quote from James Christopher:

Markowitz style portfolio optimization is ubiquitous and the bedrock of modern portfolio theory. Though it is not without flaws…

  • Assumes normality in returns
  • Requires computation of a covariance matrix
  • Requires inverting of a covariance matrix
  • Often ends up highly concentrated in one security

An alternative presented by Konno and Yamazaki in 1991 suggested that Markowitz style portfolio optimization could be replaced/improved with a model utilizing the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) as a measure of risk. Some benefits of MAD portfolio optimization they claim are it…

  • Requires no computation or inversion of a covariance matrix
  • Is computationally more efficient as it solves a linear optimization vs a quadratic optimization
  • Does not assume normality of returns

In their paper Portfolio Optimization: MAD vs. Markowitz Beth Bower, and Pamela Wentz show there is little significance between Markowitz and MAD portfolios. They went on to compute the tangent portfolio for both Markowitz and MAD. I stopped at the minimum variance portfolio as there is a non trivial amount of minimum variance material on Quantopian for comparison.

The code in the notebook is directly copyable into the IDE.

 

Categories:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s